The issue for the continuation of the Inquiry is as follows: Do subsections 25 (1), together with 25 (2) or 25 (4), apply to the information separated or obliterated from the Additional Records?
Highly-sensitive personal information used or disclosed during grievance process
A Department employee made a complaint alleging the Department disclosed his personal information to his union representative and that this information was also disclosed to and used by an Assistant Deputy Minister (ADM) who was involved in the process.
The Applicant made a request to access survey records gathered from visitors to the Yukon in the summer of 2012 and the winter of 2012/2013.
The records contained information from over 4000 visitors, had over 700 columns, and more than two million fields of data.
Access to a video recorded in the Whitehorse Correctional Centre
The Applicant made a request to be provided with a copy of a video recorded during an incident at the Whitehorse Correctional Centre in which he was involved. The Applicant also asked for all written reports, digital reports and DVR relating to the incident.
The Applicant requested a review of a decision by the Department to sever a third party’s personal telephone number from a record requested under the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
The Information and Privacy Commissioner (IPC) investigated two complaints that claimed Whitehorse Correctional Centre (WCC) violated the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (ATIPP Act). The Complainant alleged that WCC violated the ATIPP Act when it used an internal, informal process to manage his request for access to information written on an ATIPP Request form rather than the formal process set out in the ATIPP Act. The records he requested contained his own personal information, third party personal information, and non-personal information. The Complainant also alleged that WCC conducted an inadequate search for the photographs he requested.
Did the Whitehorse Correctional Centre disclose personal information without authority?
On September 30, 2014, the Information and Privacy Commissioner (IPC) received a complaint alleging that personal information was disclosed without authorization to a lawyer in the Legal Services Branch of the Public Body (Justice Lawyer) by Whitehorse Correctional Centre (WCC), also within the Public Body, contrary to the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (ATIPP Act). The Complainant also alleged that WCC disclosed the personal information of another inmate to the Justice Lawyer and the Yukon Human Rights Commission (YHRC) in violation of the ATIPP Act.
Was the personal information of Health and Social Services clients disclosed contrary to the requirements of the ATIPP Act?the ATIPP Act?
A former Yukon Government employee, alleged that records containing the personal information of Health and Social Services (HSS) clients had been disclosed to her by HSS contrary to the requirements of the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (ATIPP Act).
